The New York Times doubles down on scathing opinion pieces criticizing Biden

• New York Times publisher AG Sulzberger said the White House was “deeply offended” by the paper’s coverage of President Biden’s age.
• Sulzberger insists the newspaper will continue to objectively report on both Biden and Trump despite complaints from the White House
• The report has been criticized for emphasizing Biden’s age and low approval ratings, with some saying it may be too sensational.

The publisher of The New York Times says the White House is unhappy with the paper’s recent coverage following a series of opinion pieces highlighting President Joe Biden’s age and unfitness to run for a second term. I made it clear what I said.

AG SulzbergerThe 43-year-old, who has been a publisher for the past six years, said the White House is “very upset,” but he insists: The newspaper said it would “continue to provide complete and fair reporting.”

“We will continue to fully and fairly cover not just Donald Trump, but President Joe Biden,” he told the Reuters Institute in an interview.

Sulzberger said the paper is dedicated to providing comprehensive and fair reporting.

“He is a historically unpopular incumbent and the oldest person ever to hold this job. We have reported extensively on both of these realities, and the White House I’m outraged,” Sulzberger said.

The criticism has drawn disapproval from both the Biden campaign and some members of the media.

Special Counsel Robert Hur’s recent report called Biden an “old man with a bad memory,” further increasing media attention.

Margaret Sullivan, a former New York Times public editor, said she believed the reporting, especially within the New York Times, was sensational.

“For the media to make this a top campaign issue is nothing short of journalistic malfeasance,” she wrote on her blog.

Sullivan asked Sulzberger to ask the New York Times’ opinion editors and top news editors to stop “going too far in both reporting and commentary on Biden’s age” and to “restrict both reporting and commentary on the subject.” He asked for instructions to “tone it down.”

Mr. Sulzberger has sought to clarify his position in response to critics who point out how important it is to maintain public trust in the Times while avoiding unfair reporting.

“I’m not saying this is the same as Mr. Trump’s five trials or that they’re evenly matched,” Sulzberger said. ‘They’re different. But they are both true, and the public needs to know both. And if you overstate one team and downplay the other, there’s no reason for any team to trust you in the long run. ”

Authors at the New York Times skewered the president in a series of opinion pieces, saying Biden’s team has “no plan” for how to deal with his senile behavior, and that Biden He simply said, “He should not run for re-election.” election’.

The spate of opinion pieces pointing knives at the 81-year-old president began over the weekend of February 9th and 10th, when a classified Justice Department report described him as a forgetful old man. This was in response to the investigation into the handling of the matter.

A 388-page report by special prosecutor Robert Hur confirmed that he would not be indicted, possibly because a jury could conclude that he was a “well-meaning old man with diminished capacity” and a “poor memory.” He says this is because it will lead to a conclusion.

According to left-wing newspapers, Biden’s lack of enthusiasm on the campaign trail, combined with his aloof public appearances and “grumpy grandpa” demeanor, is a major concern during this “dark period” of his presidency. There is. ‘

“He must do more to demonstrate to the nation that he is fully capable of serving as president until he is 86,” the Times’ board said.

On February 9, the New York Times editorial board published a damning honest opinion piece titled “The Challenges of an Aging President.”

“This is a dark moment for Mr. Biden’s presidency,” the paper’s team concluded.

The article argues that “the president’s cognitive ability to deliver an emotional and nimble rebuttal at a time when people are looking for stable, even-handed, and competent answers to fair questions about the president’s health.” “raised further questions about his sharpness and temperament.”

“His assurances…were ineffective,” the commission wrote. He’ll have to try harder — for Mr. Biden, if he wants to survive the campaign with the help of teleprompters and aides and somehow defeat a clearly unqualified opponent like Donald Trump. The stakes in this presidential election are too high. ”

They acknowledged that Trump has “a very real chance of retaking the White House.”

The article suggests that Biden is being kept in the dark by his advisers because of his age, and that instead of campaigning with the people and building confidence, they are doing the exact opposite. are doing.

“The combination of Mr. Biden’s age and absence from public life has undermined public trust,” the letter said. He looks like he’s hiding, or worse, hiding.

“The details in Heo’s report only heighten these concerns, and the Trump campaign is already capitalizing on them.”

This wasn’t the only op-ed published in the New York Times this weekend highlighting Biden’s aging status.

Maureen Dowd, 72, is a longtime journalist and opinion writer for The Times. She published her column on February 10th titled “Mr. Mr. President, please stop hiding your health.

She wrote in the NYT: “We can no longer be stealth about health, and the sooner President Biden’s team stops being in denial about it, the better off Democrats will be.”

Liberal columnists argue that Biden is in bubble wrap and that it won’t work for Democrats to go on the defensive when Trump is on the offensive at a time when “the world is on fire.” insisted.

Dowd claimed that Jill Biden and her advisers tried to come up with ways to “reduce the signs of aging,” but none of them worked.

As a result of his efforts to avoid being seen as a “grumpy grandpa,” he actually shows himself as a full-fledged “grumpy grandpa.”

Dowd said that even though Biden is running against Trump, a “bad guy,” that alone is “not enough” and he needs to “admit to himself that momentary wobble is a major weakness.” He said there is.

A New York Times reporter said, “Many Americans are deeply concerned about the 81-year-old president’s crepuscular symptoms.” That’s the elephant in the room. However, elephants never forget.

“Donald Trump, 77, makes gaffes and shows signs of aging, but he conveys more energy.

The third scathing opinion piece published in the newspaper over the weekend was by 44-year-old political analyst Ross Douthat.

The title of his damning article was “It’s not a question of whether Biden should leave.” It’s a “method”.

“Joe Biden should not run for re-election,” Douthat wrote in the Times.

“The impression the president gives in public is one of extreme frailty rather than senility, like a lightbulb that stays on even if you turn it on a dimmer.”

He said if Biden were to resign and appoint Kamala Harris as vice president, “it would make it even more likely that she would lose to Donald Trump.”

But he says: “If he drops out and doesn’t support his No. 2, he will expose himself to a narrative of identitarian betrayal — an old white president’s first woman of color. A Knife Wound – And He Would Start His Own Party Months of bloodshed and betrayal followed, a constant swirl of personal and ideological drama.

Biden has long had a reputation for making embarrassing gaffes and gaffes, even describing himself as a “gaffe machine” in 2018, but this has worked to his benefit in the past in some ways, as his team looks to Uncle Joe’s Now I can explain my mistakes. Folk and goofy charm.

However, the frequency of his stumbling over words has increased dramatically, causing concern. And it is accompanied by evidence of physical frailty.

Since 2021, he has reportedly tripped eight times while navigating the stairs of the presidential plane, Air Force One, including three times on one flight to Atlanta.

In the summer of 2022, he fell off his bike after getting caught in the pedals. In 2023, at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, he tripped while descending a small staircase. Later that year, he tripped over a sandbag and fell onto the dais at the Air Force Academy’s graduation ceremony.

And last year, when the stairs to Air Force One were shortened and he boarded the plane at a lower level, Biden tripped on the stairs.

In September 2022 he After speaking at the Global Fund conference, he appeared to get lost on his way off the stage.

As the applause continued, the U.S. president began to walk off the stage, then suddenly stopped and looked around with a confused look on his face.

He then asked people on the ground how to get off the stage and appeared to take several slow steps.

Most recently, he confused other world leaders and incorrectly stated when a conversation with a long-deceased politician took place.

Despite Kohl’s death in 2017, Biden spoke with German Chancellor Helmut Kohl about the January 6 riot at the Capitol in recent weeks at the 2021 G7 summit. I remembered that twice.

Other “I see dead people” confusions include British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Prime Minister Theresa May, deceased Indiana Republican Congresswoman Jackie Walorski, and the inventor of insulin who died before Biden was born. This includes things such as.

Last year, he declared that Russian President Vladimir Putin was “clearly losing” the Iraq war, not Ukraine.

Sleepy Joe (President Trump’s nickname) is already the oldest person in U.S. history to become president.

If Trump regains the White House, he would be 82 years old when his second term begins in January 2025 (he would be 78 if he wins).

Biden’s latest gaffes only add fuel to those who say he should be removed once and for all.