Healthcare systems must adopt a workplace culture that centers human well-being to create a healthy workplace culture for today. Psychosocial hazard policies can be an effective means of promoting this change.
For too long, doctors and other health professionals across Australia have endured poor organizational culture and leadership in tackling bullying, harassment, other negative interactions in the workplace, and system performance. I’m here.
These psychosocial risks must be defined and addressed by health leaders to prevent further psychological harm to staff and encourage more colleagues to remain on the front lines of health care. not.
A psychosocial hazard is anything that can cause psychological harm (see here). Common psychosocial hazards in the workplace include many items, such as poor organizational change management, bullying and harassment, and poor workplace relationships and interactions. Burnout, bullying and harassment, mental illness, racism and suicide among health care workers, and the challenges of implementing health equity programs have recently received media and political attention. He emphasized the need to improve psychosocial safety within the health care system. The latest 2023 Medical Training Survey found that 35% of all trainees and 54% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander trainees had experienced or witnessed bullying, harassment, discrimination or racism, the most common It was shown that senior clinicians have experience in this field.
Policies related to psychosocial risks and the concept itself have been developed to protect the well-being of the workforce, and these types of policies are essential for quality improvement purposes in the healthcare context.
While employee benefits have been in the spotlight recently, employee engagement has been a major focus. Having experienced emotional distress and moral injury while leading telehealth-related reforms to address health inequalities faced by local, rural, remote, and Indigenous people, I believe that issues of well-being and engagement are separate illnesses. Instead, we see it as a symptom of a single disease: poor work culture. And unrelated issues. Wouldn’t it make sense to cure this disease instead of just focusing on palliation?
There is another interesting observation. Everyone new to this role talks about a “culture reset,” but they tend to do the same thing they’ve tried before. Common behaviors seem to focus on leadership training efforts that have had mixed results in the literature (here). While the Royal Commission and numerous system reviews continue to call for cultural reform, the culture of health systems and services themselves has not been comprehensively addressed.
There seem to be two main problems. If culture is an ongoing problem, why leave it to the same people or departments that failed to improve culture in the first place? It is a focus on individual behavior as the basis of culture without consideration (here and here). Current cultural frameworks and guidelines tend to operate within hierarchical and authoritarian systems, differ in content and definition, and are not fully aligned with psychosocial risks. In order to create coherence within the Australian healthcare environment (perhaps underpinned by democratic principles), our organization, Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA), represents the nation’s highest echelon of cancer care professionals. The organization has launched a project aimed at developing a national framework for health care. Work culture based on existing guidelines and frameworks. The draft framework can be viewed on his COSA website and is applicable to all human-centred workplaces, not just medical settings and the cancer care sector.
A healthy workplace culture is one in which the entire organization is aligned with its purpose and values. Therefore, anything that is contrary to purpose and values is considered a psychosocial danger, as it leads to a poor culture and moral injury and undermines well-being. Objectives are addressed by the strategic plan, and if not all items are addressed, it indicates how well the organization is performing. For example, if health inequalities are listed as a priority and actions related to this are not even featured as agenda items across tiers, that is an example of misalignment with purpose, or in layman’s terms, ‘lip service’.
In my opinion, the difficulty in bridging the gap between rural, remote and indigenous communities can be related to this misalignment and lack of commitment within organizations. These examples are highlighted as psychosocial dangers that force the system to conform to the purposes expected by the community. Table 1 shows some examples.
Value alignment has been attributed primarily to personal behavior, without realizing that our workforce is largely made up of educated and passionate adults. . Although inappropriate behavior usually occurs in response to inappropriate system factors or behaviors, a minority of people may use rudeness and cruelty as their primary mode of interpersonal interaction. The COSA Framework and Safe Work Australia’s Psychosocial Framework consider similar holistic system factors as requirements for a healthy workplace culture and employee wellbeing, respectively. These include “interprofessional interactions, business conduct, policies, programs, procedures, and resource allocation consistent with values.”
For example, if an approval process is developed without co-design, adds unnecessary and pointless work to an already stretched workforce, and slows progress on simple items, the process is neither caring nor responsible. There’s no respect either. Naturally, the staff will react with annoyance. This means that all organizations and their hierarchies review and update their processes and policies to ensure they are always up to date and fit for purpose in enabling employees to do meaningful work. means it is necessary. This avoids inappropriate individual behavior, improves work engagement and productivity, and ultimately leads to better mental health for employees.
This transformation requires high-performing teams across all layers of the organization (as I wrote on page 22). A consistent national checklist tailored to the health situation is needed to guide team development so that team quality and performance are consistent across the system, regardless of the quality and ability of the team leader. is. Without a team framework, a group of individuals will work under a framework determined primarily by two individuals, he or she. Diversity, inclusion, interdisciplinary voices, empowerment, belonging, collective leadership and engagement can all be formally addressed through team-based operations. Formal inclusion of junior members on medical and management teams not only provides diversity in thought processes, but also allows for leadership and professional development in the field. When it comes to monitoring and enabling team functionality, team framework compliance can be used to promote team culture. Psychosocial hazard policies are used to de-escalate poor operational and personal behavior in teams, and can not only improve well-being, but also promote team morale and improve performance. .
In summary, to be fully effective, psychosocial hazard policies must be implemented with cultural change and integrated into existing workflows. These should not be treated as separate, independent policies that can be checked by forming separate committees or working groups.
I urge politicians, health sector leaders and medical leaders to adopt the draft COSA framework if they truly believe in improving workplace culture and protecting the well-being of an already stretched workforce. We recommend that you consider it. These reforms must be led by senior leaders in healthcare settings in collaboration with human resources professionals and all tiers of the system to achieve system-wide adoption and sustainability.
Professor Sabe Sabesan BMBS PhD FRACP is the President-elect of the Australian Society of Clinical Oncology. He is the clinical director of the Townsville Medical Training Network. Senior Medical Oncologist in the Department of Medical Oncology at Townsville Cancer Center.
The statements and opinions expressed in this article reflect the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official policy of the AMA. M.J.A. or Insight+ Unless otherwise stated.
Subscribe for free Insight+ weekly newsletter here. It can be viewed by all readers, not just registered physicians.
If you would like to submit an article for consideration, please send the Word version to: [email protected].